SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanyama v Danree Multihandling Services Limited (Miscellaneous Application E180 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 765 (KLR) (8 April 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELRC 765 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
765
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 765 (KLR)
Decided
8 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent failed to respond to the applicationCoramOCHARO KEBIRA
Application dismissed as lacking in merit

Facts

The applicant, Jackline Munandi Wanyama, reported workplace injuries on March 23, 2016, and filed a suit in Thika CMCC Case No. 833 of 2017. The suit was yet to be set down for a hearing.

Issues

  • Extension of time for reporting workplace injuries to the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services
  • Application under Work Injury Benefits Act

Reasoning

The court has appellate jurisdiction over Work Injury Benefits Act matters. The applicant failed to explain why she did not act within the statutory timelines. The court cannot act capriciously or under the influence of sympathy.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act
  • Employment Act
  • Limitation of Actions Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited v Nathan Karanja Gachoka & another
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & Others
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case