SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Chepkemoi v Maasai Mara University (Cause E001 of 2020) [2024] KEELRC 774 (KLR) (16 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 774 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
774
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 774 (KLR)
Decided
16 April 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramDN NDERITU
Holding

The court finds that there was a contract of employment between the claimant and the respondent, and the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Facts

The claimant, Penvilla Chepkemoi, is seeking unpaid wages and other reliefs from the respondent, Maasai Mara University, for services rendered as a teacher. The respondent has filed a reply denying the claim.

Issues

  1. Was there a contract of employment between the claimant and the respondent?
  2. Is the claimant entitled to the reliefs sought?
  3. Who should bear the costs of the cause?

Reasoning

The court relies on the definition of a contract of service in the Employment and Labour Relations Act, which includes oral and written contracts. The court also considers the provisions regarding the requirement for a written contract for a period of three months or more.

Outcome

The claimant is awarded the costs of the cause and the unpaid wages, with interest and a certificate of service.

Orders

  • Unpaid wages of Kshs.293,910/=.
  • Interest on the above amount at court rates.
  • Certificate of service to be issued within 30 days of this judgment.
  • Costs of the cause and interest thereon to the claimant.

Remedies

  • Unpaid wages
  • Interest on wages
  • Certificate of service
  • Costs of the cause

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case