SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Adhiambo v Nyokabi & another (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1223 of 2018) [2024] KEELRC 788 (KLR) (11 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 788 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
788
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 788 (KLR)
Decided
11 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureClaim against Respondents for unpaid wages, wrongful termination, and other employment-related claimsCoramMN NDUMA
The court finds that the claimant was employed from February 2015 to May 2018, and the respondents paid her a monthly salary of Kshs 13,572/= as alleged. The claim for underpayment is dismissed, and the claimant's termination is not found to be unlawful.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a house help from February 2015 to May 2018. She alleged underpayment and wrongful termination, while the respondents disputed these claims.

Issues

  • Whether the claimant was employed in 2015 or 2016?
  • Whether the claimant left employment voluntarily or was terminated unlawfully?
  • What remedies are available to the claimant?

Reasoning

The court relies on the evidence and the Employment Act, 2007, to determine the facts and dismiss the claim for underpayment.

Outcome

The claimant's claim for underpayment is dismissed, and the claimant's termination is not found to be unlawful.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case