SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kimathi v Kenya National Trading Corporation (Judicial Review Application E011 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 813 (KLR) (28 March 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 813 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
813
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 813 (KLR)
Decided
28 March 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial Review ApplicationPostureApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedingsCoramMativo, OCHARO, Warrington L.
The court granted leave to Kimathi to commence judicial review proceedings and granted a stay of the Respondent's decision.

Facts

Purity Ntibuka Kimathi was employed by Kenya National Trading Corporation Ltd as General Manager, Corporate Services. She was dismissed on February 22, 2023, without a probationary period and without a performance appraisal.

Issues

  • constitutionality of the dismissal
  • violation of employment contract
  • breach of human resource policy

Reasoning

The court found that the dismissal was not in accordance with the employment contract and the human resource policy, and that the performance appraisal was improperly conducted.

Outcome

Grant of leave to commence judicial review proceedings

Orders

  • Stay of the Respondent's decision to terminate Kimathi's employment

Remedies

  • Quashing the Respondent's decision
  • Prohibition against advertising, shortlisting, conducting interviews and selection
  • Compelling the Respondent to ensure Kimathi is accorded all benefits as General Manager, Corporate Services
  • Compelling the Respondent to pay the remainder of Kimathi's contract term and benefits

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Civil Procedure Rules
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case