SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Waweru v Majid Al Futtaim Hypermarkets Limited t/a Carrefour (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E158 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 837 (KLR) (18 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 837 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
837
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 837 (KLR)
Decided
18 April 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour Relations PetitionPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramMATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
Holding

The petition lacks merit and is dismissed. The reliefs sought by the petitioner are not merited and are denied.

Facts

The petitioner, Peter Nyingi Waweru, was employed by the respondent, Majid Al Futtaim Hypermarkets Limited t/a Carrefour, as a section manager. He was promoted to store manager and received a salary of Kshs. 152,170.00. He was suspended and later dismissed for receiving Kshs. 50,000 from a supplier in breach of the code of ethics.

Issues

  1. Whether the summary dismissal was for a valid reason following a fair procedure.
  2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The respondent proved a valid reason for the summary dismissal and followed fair procedure. The petitioner admitted to receiving the money and failed to provide evidence to the contrary.

Outcome

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petition dismissed
  • Petitioner to pay costs to respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (6)
  • Employment Act 2007
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act No. 4 of 2015
  • Computer misuse and cybercrime Act No. 5 of 2018
  • Data protection Act No. 24 of 2019
  • National Police Service Act Cap 84
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case