SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shikuku v Mini Bakers Nairobi Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E060 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 854 (KLR) (18 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 854 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
854
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 854 (KLR)
Decided
18 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from original trialCoramBOM MANANI
The court orders a refund of Ksh. 37,097.00 for the allegedly deducted salary and declines to enter judgment for medical insurance cover.

Facts

The Claimant, Crspinus Shikuku, was an Oven Operator hired by the Respondent, Mini Bakers Nairobi Limited, on 23rd March 2009. On or about 29th November 2018, he sustained injuries while on duty. The Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services assessed his compensation at Ksh. 1,341,660.00, with the Respondent paying Ksh. 900,211.00, leaving a balance of Ksh. 441,449.00. The Claimant claimed for a refund of Ksh. 37,097.00 allegedly deducted from his salary.

Issues

  • Refund of allegedly deducted salary
  • Medical insurance claim

Reasoning

The court finds the deductions unlawful and justifies the refund. The medical insurance claim lacks financial projection evidence.

Outcome

Judgment for the Claimant for Ksh. 37,097.00 for the refund of allegedly deducted salary; judgment for Ksh. 441,449.00 for the balance of the award; no judgment for medical insurance.

Orders

  • Refund of Ksh. 37,097.00 for allegedly deducted salary
  • Judgment for Ksh. 441,449.00 for the balance of the award
  • Decline to enter judgment for medical insurance cover

Remedies

  • Refund of Ksh. 37,097.00 for allegedly deducted salary
  • Judgment for Ksh. 441,449.00 for the balance of the award
  • Costs awarded to the Claimant
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case