SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okeyo v Ministry of Works Sports Club (Cause E118 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 865 (KLR) (5 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELRC 865 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
865
Citation
[2024] KEELRC 865 (KLR)
Decided
5 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a decision declaring the Claimant redundantCoramSTELLA RUTTO
The Claimant is entitled to severance pay but not to unpaid salary or leave pay

Facts

Claimant was employed as a security guard by the Respondent from March 2017. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, he was sent home indefinitely in March 2020 and declared redundant on August 26, 2021. He sought unpaid salary, leave pay, and severance pay.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to unpaid salary and leave pay
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to severance pay

Reasoning

The pandemic caused a downturn in business operations, and the Claimant did not render service during the period he was sent home. The Court found the Claimant's claim for unpaid salary and leave pay to be inadmissible.

Outcome

The Claimant is entitled to severance pay but not to unpaid salary or leave pay

Orders

  • The Claimant is entitled to a Certificate of Service in accordance with Section 51(1) of the Employment Act

Remedies

  • Severance pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • ELRC Cause No. E119 of 2023; Jane Kathure v Ministry of Works Sports Club
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case