SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

St Elizabeth Academy Karen Limited v Mutuota (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E196 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1046 (KLR) (28 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 1046 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1046
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1046 (KLR)
Decided
28 March 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree entered ex parteCoramJW KELI
Holding

The court granted the stay of execution of the judgment and decree, warrants of attachment, and seizure of assets pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The Appellant filed an application for a stay of execution of a judgment and decree issued on 12th February 2024, and subsequent proceedings, including garnishee orders, warrants of attachment, and seizure of assets. The Respondent initiated execution proceedings.

Issues

  1. Stay of execution of the judgment and decree
  2. Stay of execution of warrants of attachment
  3. Stay of execution of seizure of assets
  4. Stay of execution of public auction of the school bus
  5. Remedies for the Appellant

Reasoning

The court found that the delay in filing the appeal was due to the advocate's negligence, and the balance of convenience tilts in favor of granting the stay to prevent irreparable loss to the Appellant.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree
  • Stay of execution of warrants of attachment
  • Stay of execution of seizure of assets
  • Remainder of the judgment and decree to be stayed pending appeal

Remedies

  • Remainder of the judgment and decree to be stayed pending appeal
  • Remainder of the judgment and decree to be stayed pending appeal
  • Remainder of the judgment and decree to be stayed pending appeal
  • Remainder of the judgment and decree to be stayed pending appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case