SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Johnson & 134 others v Mega Garments EPZ Limited (Cause E087 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1257 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 1257 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1257
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1257 (KLR)
Decided
5 May 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramM MBARŨ
The claimants' claims are dismissed with costs.

Facts

Claimants were employed by respondent Mega Garments EPZ Limited. The claim is for non-payment of salary, leave allowance, and compensation for unfair termination of employment.

Issues

  • Whether the claimants with written contracts were underpaid, suffered unfair pay deductions, and had their employment unfairly terminated.
  • Whether the respondent employed the claimants without contracts, and if so, whether there were deductions, underpayments and unfair termination of employment.
  • Who should pay the costs.

Reasoning

The court found that the employment contracts were valid and that the respondent paid the claimants for the days worked. The claimants did not provide evidence of employment and the claims for underpayment and unfair termination were dismissed.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Minimum Wage Orders
Cases cited (3)
  • Abdala & 9 others v Zhongmei & another [2025] KECA 26 (KLR)
  • Kenya Power and Lighting Company v Osiro [2024] KECA 854 (KLR)
  • Lockwood Girls High School v Wasike [2024] KEC
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case