SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kensalrise Limited v Makundi (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E009 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 1258 (KLR) (4 April 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 1258 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1258
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1258 (KLR)
Decided
4 April 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree of the Chief Magistrate's CourtCoramMA ONYANGO
Holding

The appeal is upheld, and the judgment and decree of the trial court are set aside. The Respondent is awarded Kshs. 12,800 as one month's pay in lieu of notice and Kshs. 166,400 as 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination of his employment.

Facts

The Respondent, Makundi, sued the Appellant, Kensalrise Limited, for compensation and terminal dues for alleged unfair termination of his employment. The trial court awarded him Kshs. 12,800 as one month's pay in lieu of notice and Kshs. 166,400 as 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in law and fact by holding that the Respondent was an employee of the Appellant and awarding him compensation of Kshs. 239,195
  2. Whether the trial court erred in fact and law by failing to take into account the lack of an employment contract between the Respondent and the Appellant
  3. Whether the trial court erred in law and fact by disregarding the agreement between Kensalrise Limited and Saipo Ventures, who was an independent contractor providing manpower services to the Appellant Company
  4. Whether the trial court erred in law and fact by disregarding the evidence in court showing that the Notice to show cause letter, minutes of the disciplinary meeting, and the subsequent termination letter were issued by Saipo Ventures

Reasoning

The court re-evaluated the evidence and found that the Respondent was not an employee of the Appellant but an independent contractor. The trial court's award of compensation was based on incorrect facts and legal errors.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • Judgment and decree of the trial court set aside
  • Respondent awarded Kshs. 12,800 as one month's pay in lieu of notice and Kshs. 166,400 as 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination of his employment

Remedies

  • Kshs. 12,800 as one month's pay in lieu of notice and Kshs. 166,400 as 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination of his employment

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case