SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kaluworks Limited v Kenga (Appeal E159 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1326 (KLR) (8 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 1326 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1326
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1326 (KLR)
Decided
8 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the learned Principal Magistrate Hon. G. SOGOMOCoramOCHARO
Holding

The Appellant's termination was unlawful and unfair, and the Respondent was entitled to various reliefs.

Facts

The Respondent, Chengo K. Kenga, was employed by Kaluworks Limited as a Casting Operator from July 2009. He was terminated on April 12, 2017, without notice, and without a valid reason. He was not registered under any pension or provident fund scheme.

Issues

  1. Nature of employment
  2. Termination process
  3. Fairness of termination
  4. Reliefs granted

Reasoning

The Court found the Respondent's employment to be term employment, not casual, and the termination was unfair. The Court also found errors in the trial court's judgment regarding procedural issues.

Outcome

Affirmed the Respondent's reliefs and reversed the trial court's judgment.

Orders

  • Affirmed the Respondent's reliefs
  • Reversed the trial court's judgment regarding procedural errors

Remedies

  • One month's notice pay
  • Accumulated leave days
  • Severance pay
  • Underpayment
  • Maximum compensation for wrongful dismissal
  • Order for a Certificate of Service
  • Costs of the cause

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment Act
  • Retirement Benefits Act
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement
Cases cited (1)
  • German School Society & another v Ohany & another [2023] KECA 894 [KLR]
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case