SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ratemo v Seventh Day Adventist Church Central Rift Valley Conference (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E012 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1771 (KLR) (18 June 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 1771 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1771
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1771 (KLR)
Decided
18 June 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramAN MWAURE
The court finds and holds that the claimant was unfairly and unprocedurally terminated from her employment.

Facts

The Claimant, Jescah Gesare Ratemo, was initially employed by the Respondent, Seventh Day Adventist Church Central Rift Valley Conference, on a contractual basis starting from 2014. She was later confirmed as a Conference Accountant on a permanent and pensionable basis on November 23, 2016. She was promoted to Conference Internal Auditor in January 2019 and was earning a monthly salary of Kshs.96,452.83. She claimed unfair termination due to a romantic relationship with a man not her lawful husband.

Issues

  • Whether the claim is merited
  • Procedural fairness in termination

Reasoning

The court held that the employer failed to provide substantial justifications for the termination and did not follow the procedural requirements of the Employment Act.

Outcome

The claimant is awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice, compensation for unfair termination equivalent to 8 months' salary, interest at court rates, and costs.

Orders

  • One month's salary in lieu of notice - Kshs.96,541/2
  • Compensation for unfair termination equivalent to 8 months' salary - Kshs.771,662/64
  • Interest at court rates at 14% per annum from date of judgment till full payment
  • Costs awarded to the Claimant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case