SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Odhiambo v Prinias Enterprises Ltd t/a Prinias Hotel (Cause E031 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1774 (KLR) (19 June 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 1774 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1774
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1774 (KLR)
Decided
19 June 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramNZIOKI WA MAKAU
Holding

The Court finds the termination grossly unfair and awards compensation, refunds, and damages.

Facts

The Claimant, Fredrick Odhiambo, was employed by the Respondent, Prinias Enterprises Ltd t/a Prinias Hotel, from July 31, 2018, with a monthly salary of Kshs. 100,000. He was terminated on September 30, 2023, due to redundancy. The Claimant alleged that his salary was unlawfully reduced and that he was subjected to unfair labour practices.

Issues

  1. Unlawful termination
  2. Unpaid salary
  3. Unenforceable settlement agreement
  4. Rent arrears demand

Reasoning

The Court found the termination unlawful due to the reduction in salary and the coercive settlement agreement. The rent arrears demand was also found to be illegal.

Outcome

The Claimant is awarded Kshs. 1,200,000 in 12 months' salary, Kshs. 930,000 in refunds, Kshs. 1,240,000 in unpaid salaries, Kshs. 211,666.66 for untaken leave, Kshs. 250,000 in severance pay, and Kshs. 500,000 in damages.

Orders

  • Kshs. 1,200,000 in 12 months' salary
  • Kshs. 930,000 in refunds
  • Kshs. 1,240,000 in unpaid salaries
  • Kshs. 211,666.66 for untaken leave
  • Kshs. 250,000 in severance pay
  • Kshs. 500,000 in damages
  • Costs of the suit
  • Interest on the sums awarded
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case