SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

United Millers Limited v Mugo (Appeal E078 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 1883 (KLR) (27 June 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 1883 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1883
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 1883 (KLR)
Decided
27 June 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment of the Hon. Chief Magistrate Priscah Wamucii Nyota, dated 6th November 2024, in Nakuru C.M.E.L.R.C Cause Numbr E290 of 2023CoramJAMES RIKA
The Court held that the Trial Court did not err in its evaluation of evidence and application of Section 40[1][c] of the Employment Act; there was no evidence presented by the Appellant establishing that its plant was shut down.

Facts

James Gichuki Mugo was an Employee of United Millers Limited whose contract was terminated on account of redundancy. He worked as a Machine Attendant and filed a claim for unfair and unlawful redundancy, which was granted equivalent of 6 months' salary in compensation.

Issues

  • Whether the Trial Court erred in finding that the requirement under Section 40[1][c] of the Employment Act was not satisfied.
  • Whether the Appellant closed down its operations at Nakuru Renery and there was no requirement to apply the selection criteria under Section 40[1][c] of the Employment Act.

Reasoning

The Court found that the scaling down of operations, commenced in August 2021, suggested there remained a skeleton manpower. Operations were not shown to have closed down altogether when the Appellant notified the Employees about redundancy in October 2021.

Outcome

The Appeal is declined on the same grounds given by the Court in Appeal No. E076 of 2024.

Orders

  • The Appeal is declined on the same grounds given by the Court in Appeal No. E076 of 2024.
  • Costs to the Respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case