SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Eduardo Zinna t/a Villa Zuhura v John Bwire & Associates Advocates (Miscellaneous Application E010 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2001 (KLR) (8 July 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 2001 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2001
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2001 (KLR)
Decided
8 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent's appeal from Deputy Registrar's ruling on Advocate-Client Bill of CostsCoramM. MBARŨ
Holding

The application is dismissed. The Deputy Registrar had the requisite jurisdiction to hear and tax the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs.

Facts

The applicant Eduardo Zinna filed an application seeking to dismiss, vary, or set aside a ruling by the Deputy Registrar, Hon. Nancy Makau, on an Advocate-Client Bill of Costs from Malindi CMCC ELRC No. 65 of 2019. The respondent John Bwire & Associates Advocates opposed the application.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Deputy Registrar to hear and tax the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs
  2. Whether the taxing of the bill was correct

Reasoning

The Deputy Registrar had jurisdiction to hear and tax the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs as it arose from employment and labour relations disputes. The taxing of the bill was not in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 14 June 2024 be placed before another taxing officer for taxation
  • Costs of the application be provided for

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Advocates (Remuneration) Order
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Floriculture International Ltd v Central Kenya Ltd and 3 Others (1995) eKLR
  • Tieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v Kenya Airports Authority (2021) KECA 587 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case