SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Tamarindi Management Limited v Gatheru (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E021 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 2110 (KLR) (18 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2110 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2110
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2110 (KLR)
Decided
18 July 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of Chief Magistrate A.G.KibiruCoramON MAKAU
The court held that the termination was unlawful because the right procedure for redundancy was not followed.

Facts

The appellant, Tamarindi Management Limited, terminated the respondent, Elijah Gichuki Gatheru's employment contract on June 4, 2020, citing frustration due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The respondent filed a suit alleging unlawful termination on grounds of redundancy.

Issues

  • Whether the separation was through redundancy or frustration.
  • If redundancy, whether it was unlawfully done.
  • Whether the awards by the trial court should stand.
  • Who pays the costs of the appeal.

Reasoning

The court defined redundancy as a deliberate managerial decision to keep the business afloat or profitable, and the employee not at fault. Frustration, on the other hand, is a spontaneous occurrence without fault.

Outcome

The court upheld the trial court's judgment and awarded damages, severance pay, unpaid house allowance, and one-month salary in lieu of notice.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case