SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lekwale (Suing as Administrator and Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Hassan Abdallah Lengiremishoi) v Namunyak Wildlife Conservation Trust (Sued Thro’ Board of Trustees & another; Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health Services (Interested Party) (Petition E014 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2186 (KLR) (23 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2186 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2186
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2186 (KLR)
Decided
23 July 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPosturePetition for Declaratory and Damages OrdersCoramONESMUS N MAKAU
The court finds that the petition meets the legal threshold of a Constitutional pleading and that the respondents have violated the petitioner's rights to dignity, right of access to information, right to fair labour practices, and right to fair administrative action.

Facts

The petitioner, Lekwale, is the administrator and legal representative of the estate of the late Hassan Abdallah Lengiremishoi. The respondent, Namunyak Wildlife Conservation Trust, failed to report an occupational accident involving Lengiremishoi's death to the Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health Services.

Issues

  • Whether the petition meets the competence threshold of Constitutional pleading.
  • Whether the respondents have violated petitioner’s Constitutional rights.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The court held that the respondents' failure to comply with mandatory statutory provisions, such as Section 22 of the Work Injury Benefits Act, violated the petitioner's rights to dignity, right of access to information, right to fair labour practices, and right to fair administrative action.

Outcome

Judgment for the petitioner, including a declaration of violations and Kshs.700,000 in damages.

Orders

  • A declaration that the respondents have violated the petitioner’s rights to dignity, right of access to information, right to fair labour practices, and right to fair administrative action.
  • Payment of Kshs.700,000 as damages.
  • Costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of this judgment.

Remedies

  • Declaration of violations
  • Damages
  • Costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act 2007
  • Access to Information Act 2016
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act 2015
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case