SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muganda v Brookside Dairy Limited & 2 others (Petition E002 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2245 (KLR) (29 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2245 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2245
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2245 (KLR)
Decided
29 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePosturePetition for Violation of Constitutional Rights, Employment Act, and Fair Administrative Action ActCoramJK GAKERI, Mativo, Ndolo, Trainer
Holding

The court finds that the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated, and the Employment Act was breached.

Facts

Petitioner, T. O. Muganda, was a Salesman at Brookside Dairy Limited from March 14, 2007. He made an order valued at Kshs.578,959.37 on August 12, 2023, and collected it on the same day. He was summoned for an outstanding balance of Kshs.289,752.67 on August 17, 2023. He admitted to another order on August 16, 2023, valued at Kshs.569,358.48, with an outstanding balance of Kshs.289,821.67.

Issues

  1. Violation of constitutional rights
  2. Breach of Employment Act
  3. Violation of Fair Administrative Action Act

Reasoning

The court determined that the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated and that the Employment Act was breached. The court also found that the Petitioner was summoned for an outstanding balance of an order he had made, and the amount was not applied correctly.

Outcome

The Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated, and the Employment Act was breached.

Orders

  • The Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated.
  • The Employment Act was breached.

Remedies

  • The court ordered the respondents to rectify the violations and provide appropriate remedies.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act No. 11 of 2007
  • Fair Administrative Action Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case