SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Concrete, Structural, Ceramic Tiles Wood Plys and Interior Design Workers Union v Timsales Limited (Cause E350 of 2022) [2025] KEELRC 2265 (KLR) (31 July 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 2265 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2265
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2265 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a decision to dismiss the claim for want of prosecutionCoramNDOLO
The Court allows the Claimant a final opportunity to regularize its pleadings and notes that the period for substitution had since lapsed, and extension of time has not been sought.

Facts

The sole Grievant in the claim passed away, leaving dependants who are indigent. The dependants were unable to raise necessary fees for letters of administration ad litem, but had since received assistance and the application has been lodged.

Issues

  • Substitution of the deceased Grievant
  • Delay in filing the necessary application for letters of administration ad litem

Reasoning

The Court considered the response filed by the Claimant and noted the reason for the delay in substituting the Grievant. The Court allowed the Claimant a final opportunity to regularize its pleadings.

Outcome

The claim is allowed a final opportunity to regularize its pleadings and the Court notes the delay in filing the necessary application for letters of administration ad litem.

Orders

  • Allow the Claimant a final opportunity to regularize its pleadings
  • Once the letters of administration ad litem are received, the Claimant may move the Court for any required enlargement of time
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case