SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sana Industries Limited v Aibu (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E103, E104, E107, E106, E133, E132 & E131 of 2025 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEELRC 2329 (KLR) (30 July 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 2329 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2329
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2329 (KLR)
Decided
30 July 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramJW KELI
The court granted the application for a stay of execution pending appeal.

Facts

Sana Industries Limited filed an application for a stay of execution of a judgment awarding Kshs 418,080 to Andrew Wekesa Aibu, pending the hearing of an appeal. The respondent opposed the application, arguing that the appeal has no chances of success and that the offered security is insufficient.

Issues

  • Whether the application for stay pending appeal was merited.
  • Whether the offered security was sufficient.

Reasoning

The court found that the application was merited due to the lack of chances of success for the appeal and the insufficient security offered.

Outcome

The court granted the application for a stay of execution pending appeal.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • Admission of the original logbook of Motor Vehicle Registration number KCC xxxH as security.

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court [Procedure] Rules 2024
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case