SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MM Kimuli & Co Advocates v Brinks Security Services Ltd (Miscellaneous Application E122 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 253 (KLR) (31 January 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 253 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
253
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 253 (KLR)
Decided
31 January 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks to set aside the Taxing Master's findings and assess instruction fees in accordance with the law.CoramSC RUTTO
The Court allows the Chamber Summons and remits the taxation of the Bill of Costs dated 9th June 2023 for taxation by a different Taxing Officer.

Facts

The Applicant/Applicant/Appellant filed a Chamber Summons against the Taxing Officer's decision on the taxation of the Advocate/Client bill of costs dated 9th June 2023.

Issues

  • Whether the Court should interfere with the exercise of discretion by the Taxing Officer

Reasoning

The Court held that the Taxing Officer's decision was not based on an error of principle and the fee awarded was not manifestly excessive.

Outcome

The Chamber Summons is allowed.

Orders

  • The taxation of the Bill of Costs dated 9th June 2023 is set aside and remitted for taxation by a different Taxing Officer.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • First American Bank of Kenya Ltd v Gulab P. Shah, Panachand Jivraj Shah & Dipack Panachand Shah [2002] KEHC 1277 (KLR)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case