SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Hakika Transport Services Limited v Musango (Appeal E059 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2536 (KLR) (25 September 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2536 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2536
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2536 (KLR)
Decided
25 September 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of Hon. J. B. KaloCoramHon. M MBARŨ
The appeal is set aside, and the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

Facts

The respondent claimed he was employed as a driver by the appellant from April 2015, with a wage of Ksh. 14,943 per month. The wage increased to Ksh. 710 by January 2023. The respondent was dismissed through summary dismissal on 10 March 2023, citing underperformance and fuel shortage.

Issues

  • Whether the termination of employment was fair and justifiable
  • Whether the respondent was entitled to various forms of compensation

Reasoning

The court found that the termination was not fair and justifiable due to the lack of substantiated allegations and the absence of due process.

Outcome

Set aside

Orders

  • Affirm the trial court's judgment

Remedies

  • Notice pay Ksh.27,710
  • House allowance for 84 months (May 2015 to February 2023) Ksh.272,000
  • Overtime pay for 4 hours per day Ksh. 163,820
  • Unpaid leave days for 7 years Ksh. 193,970
  • Unpaid public holidays for 7 years Ksh. 45,259.60
  • Refund of unremitted NSSF deductions for 30 months Ksh.6,000
  • Severance pay for 7 years Ksh.96,985
  • 12 months' compensation Ksh.332,520

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Juma v United Millers Limited (Appeal E009 of 2024)
  • Omolo v Maseno University
  • Mbeki v Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case