SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kihara v Ekaterra Tea Kenya Plc (Cause E007 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2537 (KLR) (26 September 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2537 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2537
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2537 (KLR)
Decided
26 September 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair DismissalPostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramJAMES RIKA
Holding

The Court declines the Claimant's claim for constructive dismissal and damages, but grants the Respondent's counterclaim for Kshs. 624,926 and interest on the counterclaim.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as a Manufacturing Manager by the Respondent. He was confirmed as Plant Manager at the Mabroukie factory in Limuru. He worked for 3 years before being constructively dismissed. Despite his exemplary performance, he was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and later received a notice of poor performance.

Issues

  1. Constructive dismissal
  2. Unfair dismissal
  3. Discrimination in PIP placement
  4. Procedural irregularities in PIP

Reasoning

The Court found that the Claimant's resignation was abrupt and he did not provide notice as per the contract. The PIP was found to be procedurally irregular and the Claimant's performance was not unattainable.

Outcome

The Claimant's claim for constructive dismissal and damages is declined, and the Respondent's counterclaim is granted.

Orders

  • Granting the Respondent's counterclaim for Kshs. 624,926 and interest on the counterclaim

Remedies

  • Interest on the counterclaim granted at court rate from the date of judgment till payment is made in full
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case