Kiguru v Uptext East Africa Limited & another (Cause E1109 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 2703 (KLR) (3 October 2025) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 2703
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 2703 (KLR)
- Decided
- 3 October 2025
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeReview of Employment and Labour Relations Court RulingPostureRespondents/Applicants seek review of the Court's RulingCoramSC RUTTO
Holding
The Application is dismissed with an order that costs shall be in the cause
Facts
The Applicants sought a review of the Court's Ruling directing them to deposit USD 14,000 in a joint interest-earning account and stay execution pending the suit. The Court found that the Applicants did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of an error in the ruling.
Issues
- Whether the Applicants have established sufficient grounds to warrant review of the Ruling
- Whether the Court's order for security was based on a mistake or error apparent on the face of the record
Reasoning
The Court found that the Applicants did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of an error in the ruling and that the order for security was based on a credible apprehension that the ultimate satisfaction of a potential judgment could be defeated or frustrated.
Outcome
Dismissed
Orders
- Order that costs shall be in the cause
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2024
- Civil Procedure Rules
- Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)
Cases cited (1)
- National Bank of Kenya Ltd vs Ndungu Njau (1997) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…