SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Eshitubi v Talash Dry Cleaners and Laundry (Cause 390 of 2018) [2025] KEELRC 2806 (KLR) (16 October 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2806 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2806
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2806 (KLR)
Decided
16 October 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair DismissalPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramMN NDUMA
Holding

The claim for unlawful and unfair termination lacks merit and is dismissed. The Claimant is not entitled to payment in lieu of notice, reinstatement, or award of damages. The Claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of leave days not taken in the sum of Kshs. 34,000.00 with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till payment in full.

Facts

The Claimant, David Eshitubi, was employed as a Plant Mechanic Operator. On September 18, 2017, he was reported to have come to work under the influence of alcohol and was pushed out by the mother of the Respondent's director. He was later given a warning letter, which he refused to sign.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant's employment was wrongfully terminated
  2. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the relief's sought

Reasoning

The Respondent denied terminating the Claimant's employment. The court found that the Claimant absconded work upon refusing to accept and sign the warning letter given to him by the Respondent's representative.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of leave days not taken in the sum of Kshs. 34,000.00 with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till payment in full.
  • The Respondent to give the Claimant a certificate of service within 30 days of this judgment.

Remedies

  • Payment in lieu of leave days not taken

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case