SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyakweba v Directline Assurance Company Limited (Cause 297 of 2019) [2025] KEELRC 2981 (KLR) (22 October 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 2981 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2981
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 2981 (KLR)
Decided
22 October 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair and Unlawful DismissalPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramDKN MARETE
Holding

I find a case of wrongful, unfair and unlawful termination of the Claimant’s employment by the Respondent.

Facts

Claimant was employed by Respondent as a Claims Officer on permanent and pensionable terms. She was promoted to Deputy Claims Officer and later to Claims Manager. On 23rd December, 2015, the Respondent expressed desire to renew the contract. The contract expired on 3rd June, 2016, but the claimant was issued with a letter confirming her new status and employment on 1st February, 2016. On 9th May, 2016, the Human Resource Manager informed the claimant that her contract was terminated due to operational requirements and anticipated changes in the organization.

Issues

  1. Whether the termination of employment was wrongful, unfair and unlawful.
  2. Whether the claimant is entitled to the relief sought.

Reasoning

The claimant’s case is supported by the Employment Act, 2007, and the claimant failed to demonstrate adherence to section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007, which forms the bedrock of the essentials for a fair and procedural case of redundancy.

Outcome

The claim is allowed.

Orders

  • Twelve (12) months salary as compensation for unlawful termination of employment.
  • Interest at court rates from the date of this judgment of court till payment in full.
  • The costs of this cause shall be borne by the Respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (2)
  • Walter Ogal Anuro vs Teachers Service Commission (2013) eKLR
  • VMK VS CUEA (2013) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case