SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Irving Industries Limited v Casmil Kyeva Kiungua Limited; Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health Services (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Application E021 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3012 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3012 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3012
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3012 (KLR)
Decided
31 October 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file an appeal and stay of executionCoramSC RUTTO
The Court has jurisdiction to grant the orders sought by the Applicant and extends the time for filing the appeal.

Facts

The Applicant, Irving Industries Limited, sought to extend the time to file an appeal against the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services (DOSH) award due to delays in receiving a response to its objection.

Issues

  • Whether the Court has jurisdiction to extend the time for filing an appeal against an award made by the Director under the Work Injury Benefits Act
  • Whether the Applicant has met the requisite conditions for the grant of such extension

Reasoning

The Court found that the Applicant had a reasonable explanation for the delay and that the conditions for extension were met.

Outcome

The Application is allowed with the Applicant being granted leave to file an appeal out of time.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Stay of execution pending appeal denied

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2024
Cases cited (1)
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v. Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 Others [2014] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case