Muka v Mungai, Chairperson Kafucouncil & 3 others; Nandi & 3 others (Interested Parties) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E103 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3095 (KLR) (7 November 2025) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 3095
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 3095 (KLR)
- Decided
- 7 November 2025
Summary at a glance
TypeInterlocutory MotionPostureInterlocutory Motion to restrain the 3rd Respondent from presiding over the graduation ceremony and to appoint a qualified and neutral senior academic officer as acting Vice ChancellorCoramHS WASILWA, Nduma Nderi, Prof. Manyasa, Prof. Manyasa
The application is dismissed as it lacks legal standing or authority to interpret, vary, or declare appellate or superior court orders 'spent' or 'lapsed'.
Facts
The 2nd Interested Party/Applicant filed a Notice of Motion seeking orders to restrain the 3rd Respondent from presiding over the graduation ceremony and to appoint a qualified and neutral senior academic officer as acting Vice Chancellor.
Issues
- Whether the application lacks legal standing or authority to interpret, vary, or declare appellate or superior court orders 'spent' or 'lapsed'
- Whether the application amounts to the court sitting on appeal or conducting a review of appellate or superior court orders
Reasoning
The Court of Appeal's orders in Civil Application No. E028 of 2025, consolidating related proceedings, expressly directed that the status quo with regard to the office of the Vice Chancellor of Kaimosi Friends University be maintained pending determination of the intended appeal. The application is dismissed as it amounts to the court sitting on appeal or conducting a review of appellate or superior court orders.
Outcome
Dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The status quo as regards the office of the Vice Chancellor of Kaimosi Friends University shall be maintained pending determination of the intended appeal.
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…