Kenya Tertiary and Schools Workers Union (KETASWU) v ABSA Bank Kenya PLC & 2 others; Registrar of Trade Unions & 5 others (Interested Parties) (Judicial Review Application E035 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3184 (KLR) (13 November 2025) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 3184
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 3184 (KLR)
- Decided
- 13 November 2025
Summary at a glance
TypeJudicial Review ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks to quash a previous order and compel reinstatement and disclosure of account informationCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The order issued by the 2nd respondent is quashed, and the 1st respondent is ordered to reinstate and restore the account balance and provide further deposits and a statement.
Facts
The applicant sought to quash an order issued by the Chief Magistrates Court at Nakuru dated 12th October, 2023, and later conrmed on 15th November, 2023. The applicant also sought to compel the 1st respondent to reinstate and restore the account balance and provide further deposits.
Issues
- Quash the order issued by the 2nd respondent
- Compel the 1st respondent to reinstate and restore the account balance
- Compel the 1st respondent to update the account with further deposits and provide a statement
- Declare the 2nd to 6th interested parties as dishonest
Reasoning
The court found the 2nd respondent's order to be procedurally flawed and the 1st respondent's actions to be in violation of the applicant's rights.
Outcome
The 1st respondent is ordered to reinstate and restore the account balance and provide further deposits and a statement.
Orders
- Order of certiorari to quash the order issued by the 2nd respondent
- Order of mandamus to compel the 1st respondent to reinstate and restore the account balance
- Order of mandamus to compel the 1st respondent to update the account with further deposits and provide a statement
Remedies
- Reinstatement and restoration of account balance
- Further deposits and statement of account
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…