SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ireri v National Bank of Kenya Limited (Petition E019 of 2022) [2025] KEELRC 3198 (KLR) (14 November 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3198 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3198
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3198 (KLR)
Decided
14 November 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureRespondent/Applicant seeks to strike out the entire Petition and Appeal for want of jurisdiction and prosecution.CoramSC RUTTO
Holding

The Petition is struck out for want of jurisdiction due to the doctrine of constitutional avoidance.

Facts

The Petitioner, Nickson Mucangi Ireri, filed a petition against the Respondent/Applicant, National Bank of Kenya Limited, alleging violations of Articles 10(2)(a) and (c), 41, 47, and 50(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. He conceded that these constitutional provisions have been actualized through legislation.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petition contravenes the doctrine of constitutional avoidance.
  2. Whether the Petition should be struck out for want of prosecution.

Reasoning

The Court held that the Petition contravenes the doctrine of constitutional avoidance as the issues raised and reliefs sought can be effectively addressed under existing statutory frameworks.

Outcome

The Petition is struck out.

Orders

  • The entire Petition be struck out for oending the Rule against Constitutional Avoidance.
  • In the alternative, the entire Appeal be struck out for want of prosecution.
  • The costs of this Application, and of the Petition, be awarded to the Applicant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Fair Administrative Action Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Communications Commission of Kenya & 5 Others v Royal Media Services Limited & 5 Others [2014] eKLR
  • Gabriel Mutava & 2 others vs Managing Director, Kenya Ports Authority & another (2016) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case