SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kinyanjui v Burhani Engineers Limited (Appeal E046 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3231 (KLR) (13 November 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 3231 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3231
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3231 (KLR)
Decided
13 November 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and Decree of the Hon. T.M. Orlando (PM) delivered on 6th February 2025, Nairobi in MCELRC E1198 of 2023CoramJW KELI, Maraga, Murgor
The court found that the Honourable Magistrate did not err in law and in fact in not finding that the Respondent did not comply with the requirements of Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007 before terminating the Claimant’s employment by way of redundancy.

Facts

The Appellant, Elizabeth Nyambura Kinyanjui, filed a Memorandum of Appeal against the Judgment and Decree of the Hon. T.M. Orlando (PM) delivered on 6th February 2025, Nairobi in MCELRC E1198 of 2023. The Respondent, Burhani Engineers Limited, was the party against whom the Appellant filed the appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the Honourable Magistrate erred in law and in fact in not finding that the Respondent did not comply with the requirements of Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007 before terminating the Claimant’s employment by way of redundancy.
  • Whether the Honourable Magistrate erred in law and in fact in determining the relief sought.

Reasoning

The court re-evaluated the extracts on the record and determined that the conclusions reached by the learned trial judge were correct.

Outcome

The appeal was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case