SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanyama v Rabdiya Construction Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Application E110 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3290 (KLR) (21 November 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3290 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3290
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3290 (KLR)
Decided
21 November 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureClaimant seeks orders for compensation and interestCoramRADIDO
The Motion is allowed, and the Court adopts the assessment of the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services as a judgment of the Court, issues a decree for Kshs 223,978.38, and awards interest from 14th October 2024.

Facts

The applicant was a casual worker who was involved in an industrial accident on 25 September 2024. The Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services assessed compensation of Kshs 223,975.38 on 14 October 2024, and the Respondent failed to pay.

Issues

  • Adoption of the Director's assessment as a judgment of the Court
  • Issuance of a decree for compensation
  • Award of interest from the date of the assessment

Reasoning

The Respondent acknowledged service but did not participate in the proceedings.

Outcome

The Motion is allowed.

Orders

  • Adoption of the Director's assessment as a judgment of the Court
  • Issuance of a decree for Kshs 223,978.38
  • Award of interest from 14th October 2024

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs 223,978.38
  • Interest at court rates from 14th October 2024
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case