SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Atuta v Mombasa Maize Millers Limited (Miscellaneous Case E047 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3322 (KLR) (25 November 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3322 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3322
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3322 (KLR)
Decided
25 November 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureApplication for adoption of assessmentCoramMA ONYANGO
The assessment is adopted as an order of this court and judgment is accordingly entered for the applicant in the sum of Ksh.158,912 together with interest at court rates from the date of filing the application in court. Costs to applicant.

Facts

Jared Tobet Atuta was employed as a casual loader by Mombasa Maize Millers Limited. On December 16, 2020, he dislocated his shoulder while off-loading maize bags for the employer, resulting in serious injuries. The Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health assessed the injury at Ksh.158,912.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant was injured while in the course of duty
  • Whether the assessment by the Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health is valid

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant was injured while in the course of duty and was satisfied with the assessment by the Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the applicant

Orders

  • The assessment by the Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health is adopted as an order of this court and judgment is accordingly entered for the applicant in the sum of Ksh.158,912 together with interest at court rates from the date of filing the application in court. Costs to applicant.

Remedies

  • Ksh.158,912 together with interest at court rates from the date of filing the application in court
  • Costs to applicant

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case