SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gitonga & 4 others v National Environment Management Authority; Law Society of Kenya & another (Interested Parties) (Cause 547 of 2018) [2025] KEELRC 3397 (KLR) (1 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3397 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3397
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3397 (KLR)
Decided
1 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment in a Labour DisputeCoramRADIDO
Holding

The Court finds the Motion incompetent and strikes it out with costs.

Facts

The Claimants sued the Respondent (National Environment Management Authority) for breach of contract and other related matters. The Respondent appealed the judgment and sought a stay of execution. The Court granted a conditional stay and the Respondent deposited Kshs 13,000,000/- in an interest-earning account. The Respondent failed to pay interest and monthly allowances, leading to further orders for deposits and garnishment of bank accounts.

Issues

  1. Whether the rm of Lumumba & Ayieko Advocates can come on record for the Respondent
  2. Whether the Respondent can be represented by external advocates
  3. Whether the Claimants were fully compensated

Reasoning

The Court allowed the rm of Lumumba & Ayieko Advocates to come on record for the Respondent, as an irregularity that can be corrected. The Respondent was represented by external advocates and the garnisheed amounts were not fully compensated.

Outcome

The Motion is found incompetent and struck out with costs.

Orders

  • The rm of Lumumba & Ayieko Advocates is allowed to come on record for the Respondent
  • The garnisheed amounts are not fully compensated and need reconciliation
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case