Bedi Investments Limited v Chore (Appeal E021 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 340 (KLR) (12 February 2025) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 340
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 340 (KLR)
- Decided
- 12 February 2025
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the trial courtCoramJ RIKA
Holding
The court finds that Bedi Investments Limited has not presented evidence to establish that it would suffer substantial loss if the decree is executed.
Facts
Bedi Investments Limited filed an application for a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal. The trial court dismissed the application on the grounds that Bedi Investments Limited failed to establish that it would suffer substantial loss if the decree was executed.
Issues
- Whether Bedi Investments Limited would suffer substantial loss if the decree was executed.
- Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the application for stay of execution.
Reasoning
The court considered the evidence presented and found that a letter from the bank indicating an overdrawn account is not sufficient evidence of substantial loss. The court also noted that no financial statements relating to the Covid-19 period were provided.
Outcome
The application for stay of execution is declined.
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is declined.
- No order on the costs.
Authorities cited
Cases cited (1)
- H.C.C.A No. 1561 of 2007 [Milimani], Century Oil Trading Company v. Kenya Shell Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…