SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Deloraine Estates Limited v Shikuku (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E020 of 2022) [2025] KEELRC 342 (KLR) (12 February 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 342 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
342
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 342 (KLR)
Decided
12 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment declaring the respondent redundantCoramAN MWAURE
Holding

The appeal is granted, the trial court's finding of redundancy is set aside, and the respondent is declared to have voluntarily resigned.

Facts

The respondent resigned from his employment on July 16, 2017, and the appellant accepted the resignation on July 20, 2017. The appellant later claimed the respondent was declared redundant.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant erred in declaring the respondent redundant
  2. Whether the appellant erred in awarding compensation for unlawful termination

Reasoning

The court found the respondent voluntarily resigned and there was no evidence of coercion. The court also found the trial court erred in awarding compensation for unlawful termination.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Orders

  • Declaration of the respondent as having voluntarily resigned
  • Interest to be paid to the respondent at 14% per annum from July 20, 2017 to 2019
  • Set aside the judgment of Hon. B. Ochieng on August 18, 2022
  • Each party to meet their costs of the appeal and lower court proceedings

Remedies

  • Interest on the respondent's terminal dues

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Evidence Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (4)
  • Mutinda v Lavington Security Limited
  • Prideinn Hotels & Investment Limited v Madzungu
  • Tobias Ongaya Auma & 5 Others -vs- Kenya Airways
  • Hassanath Wanjiru -vs- Vanela House of Coee
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case