Board of Management, Isovya Secondary School v Salia (Appeal E016 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 345 (KLR) (13 February 2025) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 345
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 345 (KLR)
- Decided
- 13 February 2025
Summary at a glance
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree of the Senior Resident MagistrateCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The appeal is allowed, and the trial court's judgment is set aside. The respondent is found to have contributed to his termination and is not entitled to damages for unfair termination, accrued leave, public holidays, or overtime. The appellant is ordered to bear its own costs.
Facts
The respondent, Joshua Mboya Salia, was employed as a Cook by the appellant, Board of Management, Isovya Secondary School from 2011 to 2022. The respondent was terminated without just cause and reasonable notice, and the appellant refused to pay the balance salary for May 2022 and other benefits. The respondent admitted to theft and absconding duty.
Issues
- Whether the termination was fair and just
- Whether the respondent was entitled to damages for unfair termination
- Whether the respondent was entitled to compensation for accrued leave and public holidays
- Whether the respondent was entitled to damages for overtime
- Whether the respondent was entitled to a certificate of service
Reasoning
The court found that the termination was fair and just due to gross misconduct and theft, and the respondent admitted to these acts. The court also found that the respondent was not entitled to damages for unfair termination, accrued leave, public holidays, or overtime.
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and decree given herein by the trial court on 06.09.2024 is hereby set aside
- Each party to bear own costs of the appeal and suit in the trial court
- The Deputy Registrar to return the case file to the Machakos Registry forthwith within three days from today
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…