SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Moors v Bright Vision Media Limited (Cause e167 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3496 (KLR) (1 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3496 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3496
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3496 (KLR)
Decided
1 December 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeApplication to strike out claimPostureRespondent/Applicant seeks to strike out Claimant's suitCoramSC RUTTO
The Notice of Motion is dismissed, with an order that costs will be in the cause

Facts

Claimant Christina Moors was employed by Respondent Bright Vision Media Limited. The employment contract was amended multiple times, and the latest contract ended on 31st January 2022. The Claimant claims her employment was terminated on 8th March 2022, while the Respondent claims it was on 7th February 2022.

Issues

  • Whether the suit is time-barred under Section 89 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

The Court finds the issue of the actual date of termination unclear from the affidavit evidence alone and dismisses the motion to strike out the suit.

Outcome

The suit is not time-barred

Orders

  • Order that costs will be in the cause

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Limitation of Actions Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case