SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndungu v Family Bank Limited (Cause E898 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 3587 (KLR) (15 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3587 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3587
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3587 (KLR)
Decided
15 December 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureClaimant challenges termination of contract; Respondent seeks to expunge evidenceCoramBOM MANANI
Evidence is admissible if relevant and not obtained illegally, subject to constitutional considerations.

Facts

Claimant, Muchane Kagwe Ndungu, was terminated by Respondent, Family Bank Limited, due to alleged tender malpractices. The Claimant's contract was terminated after a disciplinary process.

Issues

  • Relevance of evidence
  • Procedural fairness of disciplinary process

Reasoning

The court upholds the admissibility of evidence, rejecting the Respondent's arguments that the evidence is irrelevant or obtained illegally.

Outcome

Claimant's claim upheld; Respondent's application dismissed.

Orders

  • Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Evidence Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case