SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kariuki t/a Direct Auctioneers v Sheracco Savings & Credit Society Limited & 2 others (Miscellaneous Application E024 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 3699 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3699 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3699
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3699 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramJAMES RIKA
The application for freezing the 2nd Respondent's bank account is unsustainable. The Auctioneer should proceed with execution against the 1st Respondent and pursue recovery of costs under the receivership or liquidation proceedings.

Facts

The Auctioneer applied for a freezing order to preserve funds in the 2nd Respondent's bank accounts, held with the 3rd Respondent's bank, to cover costs awarded by the Court. The 2nd and 3rd Respondents opposed the application, citing insolvency and receivership laws.

Issues

  • Authorization to issue a freezing order under Civil Procedure Rules
  • Application of insolvency and receivership laws in the context of the application

Reasoning

The Court found that the 2nd Respondent is under receivership, and legal proceedings against a company under receivership require court approval. The Auctioneer's application was therefore unsustainable.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 8th August 2025 filed by the Auctioneer is declined.
  • No order on the costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
  • Insolvency Act, 2015
  • Repealed Companies Act, Cap 486
Cases cited (1)
  • Sevani Brothers Company Kenya Limited & 4 Others v. Green Square Limited [2013] KEHC 1439 [KLR]
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case