SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndung’u v Egerton University (Cause E023 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3728 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 3728 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3728
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3728 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant v RespondentCoramJAMES RIKA
The Court allows the Claimant's claim and orders the Respondent to pay the claimed amounts.

Facts

Claimant, Dr Qwen Ngumi Ndung'u, was employed as a Lecturer by Respondent, Egerton University for 17 years. He resigned on 9th May 2022 and claimed various benefits including unremitted pension funds, deferred payments, and other allowances.

Issues

  • Claimant's entitlement to unremitted pension funds and other benefits
  • Respondent's financial status and ability to pay

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent had conceded the Claim during the hearing and was experiencing a financial crunch due to government capitation and supplier debts. The Court ordered the Respondent to pay the unremitted pension and other benefits.

Outcome

Claimant's claim is allowed.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant unremitted pension at Kshs. 2,779,126; deferred payments at Kshs. 394,319.50; unremitted loan deductions at Kshs. 110,003,66; lost interest on the pension at Kshs. 574,992; and taxable benefits at Kshs. 494,314 - total Kshs. 4,352,755.16.
  • Costs to the Claimant.
  • Interest allowed at court rate, from the date of Judgment, till payment is made in full.

Remedies

  • Payment of unremitted pension and other benefits
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case