SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Engineering Supplies Limited (Cause E006 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 447 (KLR) (20 February 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 447 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
447
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 447 (KLR)
Decided
20 February 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a Labour Relations Court decisionCoramM. Mbarũ
The court allows the claim and orders the Recognition Agreement and CBA to apply until renegotiated by the parties within the next 90 days.

Facts

The Kenya Engineering Workers Union (Claimant) and Engineering Supplies Limited (Respondent) have a Recognition Agreement and an ongoing collective agreement (CBA) dated 21 October 2022. The Claimant proposed a draft CBA with proposals for various issues, but the Respondent refused to send a counterproposal. The issue has not been resolved, and the CBA lapsed on 27 February 2013 without renewal.

Issues

  • Refusal to review the CBA
  • Proposed wage increases
  • House allowance
  • Leave travelling allowance
  • Death of an employee

Reasoning

The court found that the issue has not been resolved and that the CBA lapsed without renewal. The court ordered the parties to renegotiate the CBA within 90 days and to abide by the registered CBA terms.

Outcome

Allowed

Orders

  • Recognition Agreement and CBA to apply until renegotiated by the parties within the next 90 days
  • Each party to bear its costs
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case