SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wasame v Perimeter Protection Limited (Cause E097 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 486 (KLR) (21 February 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 486 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
486
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 486 (KLR)
Decided
21 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeApplication to Transfer Employment DisputePostureRespondent's Application Granted in PartCoramAGNES KITIKU NZEI
Holding

The application for transfer is denied, and the case will be heard by this court. The Respondent is granted leave to file and serve a list and bundle of documents within 14 days.

Facts

The Claimant was terminated from employment by the Respondent, alleging discrimination, unfairness, and violation of constitutional rights. The Respondent sought to transfer the case to a lower court and admitted documents.

Issues

  1. Transfer of the case to a lower court
  2. Admission of documents by the Respondent

Reasoning

The Employment and Labour Relations Court has unlimited jurisdiction over employment disputes, except in specific instances where delegated jurisdiction is delegated to Magistrates' Courts. The present suit involves claims that fall outside the Magistrates' Courts' jurisdiction.

Outcome

Application partially granted

Orders

  • The case will be heard by this court
  • The Respondent is granted leave to file and serve a list and bundle of documents within 14 days
  • Both parties shall file and serve their respective trial bundles

Remedies

  • Costs of the application shall be in the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Procedure Rules 2016
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case