SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

V Chokaa & Co Advocates v Roy Hauliers Limited (Miscellaneous Application E228 of 2024) [2025] KEELRC 497 (KLR) (20 February 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 497 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
497
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 497 (KLR)
Decided
20 February 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent filed a Chamber Summons seeking various orders including a stay of execution and a fresh taxation of costs.CoramRADIDO
The Summons is dismissed with costs, and judgment is entered for the advocate in the sum of Kshs 94,635/-.

Facts

The advocate filed a Bill of Costs which was taxed on 30 September 2024. The Respondent filed a Summons under a Certificate of Urgency seeking various orders, including a stay of execution of the taxed costs.

Issues

  • Whether the Summons is without merit and should be dismissed with costs.
  • Whether the Amended Motion should be allowed with specific terms.

Reasoning

The Summons was found to be without merit and the advocate's motion was allowed with specific terms.

Outcome

The Summons is dismissed with costs, and judgment is entered for the advocate.

Orders

  • The Summons dated 8 October 2024 is dismissed with costs.
  • Judgment is entered for the advocate in the sum of Kshs 94,635/-.
  • The Respondent is ordered to pay interest on the costs at 14% from the date of taxation.
  • The advocate is awarded costs of the Motion.

Remedies

  • Judgment in favor of the advocate for Kshs 94,635/-.
  • Interest on the costs at 14% from the date of taxation.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case