SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ong’era v SBM Bank (Kenya) Limited (Cause E090 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 816 (KLR) (26 February 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 816 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
816
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 816 (KLR)
Decided
26 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair and unlawful termination of employmentPostureAppeal from a decision of the Labour Relations CourtCoramDKN MARETE
Holding

The court finds the claimant liable to the respondent for the amount he borrowed and orders him to pay the outstanding loan amount of Kshs.2,181,360.45.

Facts

Victor Matara Ong’era filed a claim against SBM Bank (Kenya) Limited alleging unfair and unlawful termination of employment, violation of constitutional and statutory rights, and violation of the fair administrative actions act. The bank filed a counterclaim for outstanding loan amount.

Issues

  1. Unfair and unlawful termination of employment
  2. Violation of constitutional and statutory rights
  3. Violation of fair administrative actions act

Reasoning

The court dismissed the claimant's case of unfair and unlawful termination of employment on account of redundancy and found that the claimant is not entitled to the relief sought.

Outcome

The court dismissed the claimant's case and allowed the respondent's counterclaim.

Orders

  • The claimant be and is hereby ordered to meet and pay the respondent an amount of Kshs.2,181,360.45 as at 16th November, 2023.
  • The counter claim shall continue to accrue interest at court rates till payment in full.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment Act No. 11 of 2007
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act No. 4 of 2015
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case