SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Amutavi v DHL Supply Chain Kenya Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 271 of 2020) [2025] KEELRC 846 (KLR) (14 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 846 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
846
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 846 (KLR)
Decided
14 March 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramAN MWAURE
The court found the audio recorded documents admissible as they were produced by a computer during a period over which the computer was used to store or process information for any activities regularly carried out over that period by a person having lawful control over the use of the computer.

Facts

The Claimant, Jacqueline Amutavi, sought reliefs including being wrongly classified in a job group and compensation for underpayment. The Respondent, DHL Supply Chain Kenya Limited, filed a defence and objected to the production of audio recordings.

Issues

  • Whether the audio recorded documents are admissible before the court
  • Whether the evidence obtained in a manner that violates any right or fundamental freedom in the Bill of Rights is excluded

Reasoning

The court applied Article 50(4) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and Section 106(B) of the Evidence Act to determine the admissibility of the documents.

Outcome

The court declared the audio recorded documents admissible.

Orders

  • Judgment delivered virtually due to COVID-19 restrictions

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Evidence Act
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case