SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Zayed Children Welfare Centre v Ismael (Miscellaneous Application E008 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 983 (KLR) (27 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 983 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
983
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 983 (KLR)
Decided
27 March 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of execution and extension of time to appealCoramM. MBARŨ
The court grants the applicant 14 days to file an appeal and a stay of execution of the trial court judgment on condition that the applicant deposits Kshs 556,475 in court within 14 days.

Facts

Zayed Children Welfare Centre filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and extension of time to appeal, while the respondent opposed the application citing previous unsuccessful appeals and the applicant's failure to comply with conditions.

Issues

  • whether the court should stay the execution of the trial court judgment
  • whether the application should be allowed more time to file an appeal

Reasoning

The court allows the appeal extension due to the applicant's inability to file the appeal in time and the respondent's failure to comply with the conditions for the stay of execution.

Outcome

The applicant is granted 14 days to file an appeal and a stay of execution of the judgment on condition of depositing Kshs 556,475.

Orders

  • 14 days to file an appeal
  • Stay of execution of the judgment on condition of depositing Kshs 556,475

Remedies

  • 14 days to file an appeal
  • Stay of execution of the judgment

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case