SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sasai & 8 others v Narok County Government & another (Cause E050 of 2023) [2026] KEELRC 1127 (KLR) (30 April 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 1127 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
1127
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 1127 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2026
Judge
J Rika
Parties
raw · defendants · plaintiffs
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment entered in favour of the Claimants, save for the 2nd Claimant, on 28th February 2025CoramJ Rika
The application to set aside the judgment is dismissed, and the Claimants are entitled to gratuity.

Facts

The Claimants were employed by the Respondents for 5 years and were entitled to gratuity. The Respondents had paid part of the gratuity and were negotiating a settlement.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondents were denied the opportunity to be heard
  • Whether the Respondents had a valid response to the Claimants' allegations

Reasoning

The Respondents were served with the pleadings and instructed counsel, and their right to be heard was not impaired. The draft statement of response did not disclose an arguable case.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed
  • The Claimants are entitled to gratuity
  • The Respondents are ordered to complete the payment of gratuity

Remedies

  • Payment of gratuity

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • E&LRC [Procedure] Rules, 2024
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case