SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Juma v Al Gadhir Centre Limited (Cause 158 of 2018) [2026] KEELRC 1176 (KLR) (30 April 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 1176 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Case number
1176
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 1176 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2026
Judge
J Rika
Parties
raw · defendants · plaintiffs
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair DismissalPostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramJ Rika
The dismissal was unfair and unlawful.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as a locum nurse by the Respondent. She was placed on probation and later confirmed. She was dismissed on the grounds of failing to provide services as directed by the Employer. She claimed unfair dismissal and sought compensation.

Issues

  • Whether the dismissal was based on a valid ground under Sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act.
  • Whether the dismissal was unfair on account of procedure and substantive justification.

Reasoning

The Court found that the dismissal was not based on a valid ground under Sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act and was unfair on account of procedure and substantive justification.

Outcome

The Respondent is declared to have unfairly dismissed the Claimant.

Orders

  • Equivalent of 2 months' salary in compensation for unfair termination, at Kshs. 60,000.
  • Costs and interest at court rate from the date of Judgment till payment is made in full, granted to the Claimant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case