Bwanga v Executive Director, Anti-Counterfeit Authority & another (Employment and Labour Relations Judicial Review E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELRC 1250 (KLR) (8 May 2026) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 1250
- Citation
- [2026] KEELRC 1250 (KLR)
- Decided
- 8 May 2026
- Judge
- JW Keli
- Parties
- raw · defendants · plaintiffs
Summary at a glance
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplicant's Application
The Court finds in favor of the Applicant, declaring that neither the 1st Respondent nor the 2nd Respondent has the power to create or abolish an office in the public service and that such power is the sole constitutional and statutory prerogative of the Public Service Commission.
Facts
The Applicant was transferred to an eastern regional office by the 2nd Respondent, and later allegedly reassigned back to the head office with unclear responsibilities. The 1st Respondent issued a letter and circular to close the eastern regional office.
Issues
- Whether the 1st Respondent has the power to create or abolish an office in the public service
- Whether the 1st Respondent's actions were in accordance with the Public Service Commission's human resource instruments
Reasoning
The Court ruled that the 1st Respondent's actions were unauthorized and in violation of the Public Service Commission's human resource instruments, and thus set aside the decision to reassign the Applicant and the circular to close the eastern regional office.
Outcome
In favor of the Applicant
Orders
- Temporary injunction to maintain the status quo
- Order setting aside the decision of the 1st Respondent to reassign the Applicant
- Order setting aside the decision of the 1st Respondent to close the eastern regional office
- Order declaring that neither the 1st Respondent nor the 2nd Respondent has the power to create or abolish an office in the public service
Remedies
- Costs of the application to be paid by the 1st Respondent
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…